A Blast From the Past is a weekly meme where I intend to review book that I read in the past that has had some form of impact upon me, whether it be good or bad.The book that I have chosen this Sunday is The Great Gatsby by F Scott Fitzgerald. I say I chose it loosely, a lovely reader of my blog contacted me and asked for my opinion of this book and as I had read it in the past I decided to post a review of it in this meme.
I read this book some time ago, I can't remember when, and I have to admit that when I read it I wasn't overly impressed. Thinking about it for this review, however, has changed my opinion of it somewhat.
The Great Gatsby is a short story, but a powerful one. The narrator is Nick, a young man who has moved to Long Island to live while he learns the bond business. He lives in West Egg, full of new money, and eventually forms a friendship with his strange neighbour, Jay Gatsby, at one of Gatsby's famously wild parties. He also spends time with his cousin Daisy Buchanan and her husband Tom, who live in the even richer area of East Egg. They introduce him to Jordan Baker, a young famous girl with whom he forms a relationship. The summer becomes strange as Nick learns that Tom has a lover that he spends time with away from Daisy and that Gatsby is in fact in love with Daisy herself, having had a relationship of sorts with her in the past. Everything goes very wrong with Tom discovers the affair between his wife and Gatsby and the story ends in tragedy for everyone.
The story is about the materialism and consumerism that consumes the world following WWI. Fitzgerald was making a comment about the lifestyle of the time; he displays it as era lacks depth, morals and values. Materialism is displayed as a corrupting force; for example at one stage of their lives Gatsby and Daisy had genuine feelings for each other, but the love of money and material wealth prevents any real renewal of those feelings for each other, or rather, creates a real barrier to acting upon those feeling.
I found it inconsistent that whilst material possession and wealth were so important to all the characters, there was still this class system operating despite the existence of wealth. It wasn't just about having money, it was about how you got it. Daisy and Tom held a higher rank in this class system that Gatsby because they were born with money, whereas Gatsby had to work for his. Myrtle herself has no money really, and is therefore decidedly middle class, but she uses her affair with Tom to live like those of the upper class for a period of time. Most people are depicted as lacking in morals and simply concerned with their wealth or the appearance of having wealth.
To me Fitzgerald was clearly warning of the impending failure of materialism. I am not saying that he had predicted to the Great Depression or anything along those lines, but it is clear that all the characters in some way or another fail. For example, despite the empire of wealth that Gatsby has built up in the hopes of winning Daisy's love, he is ultimately unable to do so and fails in the most real of ways.
The characters in the book are very shallow, you only ever see what they display to each other and nothing deeper. I am sure that this is quite deliberate on Fitzgerald's part. I believe that it is another form of social comment on the superficiality of the materialism of the times. The result, however, is that I couldn't get a grasp of the characters themselves, couldn't see who they really were, only what they wanted others to see of them. I felt sometimes like I was watching this series of events unfold but was never quite sure who the protagonist was. Nick is obviously the narrator and Gatsby is 'The Great Gatsby' but who were these people really?
I think that this is where the book fell short for me. I don't mean that I think it was a bad book at all, as I said, I think that the characters were deliberately created to be superficial, and their inner selves elusive as a comment on the materialism of the times. But for me, I love reading books where I can really get to know the characters and I couldn't in this book.
Having said that, Fitzgerald is clearly talented and an amazing writer. It is incredible that in such a short book he was able to create such a detailed world; only a truly proficient writer could achieve this. It is sad to know that Fitzgerald was not appreciated in his time in the same way that he is now, but I suppose that is often the case for authors of this calibre. It wasn't until I really sat down to think about this books and its many themes, that I really appreciated just how complex a book it is.
For as much as I couldn't say that I honestly really enjoyed this book, I believe that it such a special story, so complex and rich, that no review of mine could ever do it justice.
I have also reviewed The Curious Case of Benjamin Button by F Scott Fitzgerald, you can read the review here.
I would be really interested to know what other people think of The Great Gatsby, I am sure that it is a book where there would be many differing opinions about it and reactions to it.
Feel free to leave a comment or a link back to your own post about a blast from the past that you want to share with everyone.
11 comments:
Thank you SO much for doing this!
Your take on the depth of characters is a very interesting point. I think it's because since Nick is the narrator we only know what he knows. As an outsider he's not going to be very close with the other characters.
I think Jay Gatsby is such a fantastic character, and I feel like the fact that Fitzgerald didn't go too in depth adds to his mystery. It had me asking who is this guy? I was as eager for gossip about him just as much as the guests at his parties were.
I agree with you about Nick being the narrator and so only being able to tell us what he sees, but at the same time I think Fitzgerald meant it as something more. In a way its good that he's not close to the chracters because it allows us to see the folly of the times more clearly.
I have to admit to not being that eager for gossip about Jay Gatsby. He sort of irritated me in an inexplicable way. He was so weird and alusive, but unnecesarily so.
He created his own persona to be mysterious, whats your take on why he would do that?
lovely...I really need to read this again!
I love this book! It's probably my most reread classic (perhaps this is also because it's so short? lol).
I was reading your about me and noticed you're a solicitor in Sydney! I just graduated from my LLB combined with a B of Communication at Newcastle uni. I haven't got my DLP yet, I'm thinking about it but my boyfriend is about to be admitted and it's been so hard for him to find anything with the economy the way it is, so I'm not sure I can get up the motivation to do the DLP yet. Just looking for media related work at the moment while I think about it. I'm glad to hear you love your work though! Criminal law would be such an interesting area to work in.
I love your blog too by the way! :)
Muse in the fog - glad it made you want to read it again.
Dominique - It is definitely a short book, but a powerful one too. Nice to hear that you have finished your degree at least, its hard work, congrats! It took me quite awhile to find a job as a solicitor when I first got out of uni, but having a practising certificate was essential to finding one. Some of my friends haven't gone on to get their practising certificate yet though and they are happy in the work they are doing. I hope you find something that you want to do. Im glad you love the blog.
I think the mystery comes from maintaining the illusion of who he wants to be. He lets people's imaginations fill in the blanks. The less he says the less chance he has of blowing his cover. I also think the mystery really helped boost his popularity.
The Great Gatsby has some annoying to me features-like the constant use of the term "old chap"-the last 20 pages are so are wonderfully written, beautiful prose-I enjoyed your take on the work-P S I just became a follower of your blog
I read this book for the first time last year and wondered why it had taken me so long to get to it. Loved it. I enjoyed reading your take on it.
Meggie - that's a great point about him remaining mysterious so as not to blow his cover. I adn't really thought of it from that perspective before.
I agree that 'old chap' constantly does great bit on the nerves, especilly when no noe is particualrly old. I know its just a phrase, but still...
It is definitely one of those books that everyone seems to have quite different reactions to
I agree with you that money seemed like a key point in each of the characters lives. Although, in the end, Nick realized that money wasn't all that important. He actually criticizes Tom and Daisy for having felt as if they could do anything in the world and nothing bad could possibly happen to them as long as they have money. It is true that most characters in this book, other then Nick, are lacking many morals. I believe that the characters were created to have been superficial. Mainly, to prove a point about how Americans can be. In the end though, as I have said many times, Nick realizes this and decides to be different.
Hello! Following your link over from my blog.
I have to say, I disagree with you about the characterization. Yes, they were purposefully superficial on the whole, but Fitzgerald throws in some hints about their real selves throughout the novel. Off the top of my head- Daisy sobbing over the beauty of Gatsby's custom shirts. Tom breaking Myrtle's nose. Gatsby's father showing Nick his schedule for self-improvement he had as a boy. There are glimpses into each character's inner life- that's what makes them real, and makes the book so ultimately heartbreaking.
http://deadwhiteguyslit.blogspot.com
Post a Comment
I love getting comments, so please don't hesitate to leave me one!